Security Clearance Verdicts and Press Releases

On June 16, 2010, the Edmunds Law Firm received written notification of a favorable decision made by the Administrative Judge in a security clearance matter. The hearing for this matter was held in Chicago, Illinois on March 26, 2010. In this case there were security concerns pertaining to Guideline B - Foreign Influence and Guideline C - Foreign Preference. The evidence showed that the applicant was born in Iran and revewed her Iranian passport to travel there in 2004, 2006 and 2008. Applicant also contacted family members in Iran periodically, which raised several security concerns. Attorney Edmunds was able to demonstrate through witness testimony and documentary evidence that the Applicant was trustworthy and met the eligibility requirements for access to classified information. Upon consideration of the evidence presented, the Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with the national interests to grant Applicant's security clearance.

On June 9, 2010, the Edmunds Law Firm received written notification from the Director of Site Services that a favorable decision was made with regards to their written response to an employment suitability matter. In this case, security concerns arose regarding the individual's criminal history. The Edmunds Law Firm prepare the written response to the Letter of Denial/Revocation/Suspension of Access and was able to mitigate such security concerns, saving not only our client's career, but allowed this individual to move forward in their career as a professional.

On April 30, 2010, the Edmunds Law Firm received written notification of a favorable decision made by the Administrative Law Judge in a security clearance matter. The hearing for this matter was held in San Diego, California on March 31, 2010. In this case there were security concerns pertaining to Guideline F - Financial Considerations. The evidence showed that while Applicant was deployed, a past due debt was incurred in the amount of $3,142.00 as well as an outstanding judgment in the amount of $25,000.00. Applicant had also fallen victim to identity theft while deployed. Attorney Edmunds was able to demonstrate through witness testimony and documentary evidence that Applicant was trustworthy and met the eligibility requirements for access to classified information. Upon consideration of the evidence presented, the Administrative Law Judge found that it was clearly consistent with the national interests to grant Applicant's security clearance.

On April 9, 2010, the Edmunds Law Firm received written notification of a favorable decision made by the Administrative Judge in a security clearance matter. The hearing for this matter was held in Woodland HIlls, California on November 10, 2009. In this case, security concerns arose pertaining to Guideline G - Alcohol Consumption. The evidence showed that during a time frame of approximately five (5) years, the Applicant had drank excessively to the point of being arrested, charged and vconvicted of three (3) alcohol related offenses, amongst other misconduct. Attorney Edmunds was able to demonstrate through witness testimony and documentary evidence that the Applicant was trustworthy and met the requirements for access to classified information. Upon consideration of the evidence presented, the Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with the national interests to grant Applicant's security clearance.

On April 2, 2010, the Edmunds Law Firm received written notification of a favorable decision made by the Administrative Judge in a security clearance matter. The hearing for this matter was held in Woodland Hills, California on November 10, 2009. In this case, security concerns pertaining to Guideline J - Criminal Conduct, Guideline H - Drug Involvment, and Guideline E- Personal Conduct were involved. The evidence showed that the Applicant had gone through a difficult divorce and custody battle, was arrested and charged with Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol, Domestic Violence, violating a protective order and Possession of a Controlled Substance. Attorney Edmunds was able to demonstrate through witness testimony and documentary evidence that the Applicant was trustworthy and met the eligibility requirements for access to classified information. Upon consideration of the evidence presented, the Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with the national interest to grant Applicant's security clearance.

On March 12, 2010, the Edmunds Law Firm received written notification of a favorable decision made by the Administrative Judge from the Department of Energy in a security clearance matter. The hearing for this matter was held in Livermore, California on January 14, 2010. In this case, security concerns pertaining to Criterion L - Drug Involvment and Guideline G - Personal Conduct were involved. The evidence showed that the Applicant raised some concerns while residing in a home with a roommate whom engaged in illegal drug use. The Applicant also allegedly engaged in an online conversation which revealed sensitive information. Attorney Stephanie Mendez was able to demonstrate through witness testimony and documentary evidence, that the Applicant was trustworthy and met the eligibility requirements for access to classified information. Upon consideratio of the evidence presented, the Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with the national interests to grant Applicant's security clearance.

On February 22, 2010 the Administrative Judge granted a favorable decision with regards to a security clearance matter. Security concerns arose during Applicant's background investigation with regard to Guideline G, Alcohol Consumption. This individual, a specialty engineer manager, had a history of excessive alcohol consumption resulting in alcohol related arrests and treatment in several facilities for alcohol dependance. Attorney Randi B. Walker was able to mitigate these concerns through witness testimony, numerous exhibits and then made the final argument. Upon review of the evidence presented, the Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with the national interest to grant Applicant's security clearance.

If your security clearance has been denied due to similar reasons, please contact the Edmunds Law Firm at (800) 481-2526 or online at www.nationalsecurityclearances.com .

On January 25, 2010, the Edmunds Law Firm received written notification of a favorable decision made by the Administrative Judge with regards to a Response to a Statement of Reasons (SOR) in a security clearance matter. The hearing for this matter was held in San Diego, California on August 19, 2009. In this case, security concerns pertaining to Guideline B, Foreign Influence, were involved. Although Applicant has foreign family members whom are both residents and citizens of Iraq, Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate this concern, using numerous letters of recommendation, performance evaluations and Certificates of Appreciation. Attorney Edmunds also used witness testimony and then made the final argument. Upon consideration of the evidence presented, the Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with the national interests to grant Applicant's security clearance.

If either you or someone you know has been denied a security clearance,  contact the Edmunds Law Firm at (800) 481-2526 to see how we can assist you.

 On January 15, 2010, the Edmunds Law Firm received notification from the National Security Agency (NSA) that a favorable decision was made with regards to their written response to a Statement Of Reasons (SOR). Winning a National Security allegation by only a written response is an outstanding result. In this situation, allegations of Personal Conduct and Criminal Conduct, Gudielines E and J, were involved. Attorney Stephanie Mendez, of the Edmunds Law Firm, prepared the written response to the SOR and was able to not only save our client's career, but allow them to further themselves in their career.

If either yourself or an individual that you know has received a Statement of Reasons (SOR) or Letter of Intent (LOI), please do not hesitate to contact the Edmunds Law FIrm at (800) 481-2526 to see how we can be of service to you.

On December 15, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm was granted yet another favorable decision by the Administrative Judge in a National Security Clearance matter, proving once again that experience makes the difference. This hearing was held on September 16, 2009 in San Diego, California with regards to Guideline F. This particular case involved an applicant who is a 33 year old federal contractor. Applicant has a significant amount of financial debt and was issued a Statement of Reasons outlining the Government's financial concerns. Upon considering the evidence and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information, please contact Alan V. Edmunds at (800) 481-2526.

The Edmunds Law Firm received notification on December 11, 2009 that a favorable decision was made by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security Clearance hearing, held on June 4, 2009 in New York City, New York. In this situation, allegations of Personal Conduct and Criminal Conduct, Guidelines E and J, were involved. Security concerns arose during Applicant's background investigation as a result of three previous arrests, and deliberately falsifying material facts pertaining to these arrests. Attorney Edmunds submitted numerous exhibits, took testimony and made the final argument. After weighing all of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with national interest to grant Applicant a security clearance.

If either you or a co-worker has received an SOR or a Letter of Intent (LOI) from the government, please do not hesitate to contact The Edmunds Law Firm at 800-481-2526.

The Edmunds Law Firm received notification on November 23, 2009 that their written response to a Statement of Reasons (SOR) from the National Security Agency (NSA) was successful. In this situation, allegations of Personal Conduct and Drug Involvement, Guidelines E and H, were involved. Winning a National Security allegation against a client by simply responding to an SOR is unusual and an incredible result. Attorney Stephanie Mendez, in the firm, prepared a written response to an SOR that saved our client's career and allowed this individual to continue on in their career as a professional.

If you or a co-worker has received an SOR or a Letter of Intent (LOI) from the government, please do not hesitate to contact The Edmunds Law Firm at 800-481-2526.

 On November 9, 2009, the Administrative Law Judge gave notice of a favorable decision to our client with regards to restoring this individual's security clearance. This National Security case was heard on September 2, 2009 with the Department of Energy in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The case involved Criterion L (Guideline H), specifically pertaining to previous drug use. Attorney Randi Walker was able to mitigate all concerns that were raised with regards to Applicant, by taking testimony, submitting numerous exhibits and making the final argument. Attorney Walker successfully restored the Applican't security clearance, allowing this individual to move forward in their career.

To receive more information regarding security clearances, please contact The Edmunds Law Firm at 800-481-2526.

The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision on October 28, 2009 on a National Security case. The hearing was held in San Diego, California on August 19, 2009. This case involved Guideline B and the specific facts pertained to Foreign Influence, specifically because Applicant's parents were both citizens and residents of South Korea. Concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons were due to the contact between Applicant and family members residing in a foreign country. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate these concerns and show that there is little liklihood of there being a risk for Foreign Influence as well as there being no conflict of interest between Applicant and South Korea. The clearance was granted to Applicant, allowing this individual to continue moving on in their career.

If you or someone you know has had their clearance revoked or been denied a clearance due to similar reasons, please contact the Edmunds Law Firm today to see how we can help you.

 On September 16, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm was granted a favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security Clearance case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number 08-02864 involved an applicant who received a Statement of Reasons based on Guidelines B & C, specifically because of his family ties in Germany and Iran. The hearing was held in San Antonio, Texas, where Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the numerous exhibits, witness testimony and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant on each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. Contact Attorney Alan V. Edmunds at 800-481-2526 to see how he can help you.

 The Edmunds Law Firm received notification on September 14, 2009 of a favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security Clearance case. Case number 08-04776 involved an applicant who received a Statement of Reasons (SOR) based on Guideline B, Foreign Influence, specifically because of the Applicant's ties to family in Hong Kong. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate all concerns raised in the SOR and upon considering volumes of exhibits, witness testimony and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant on each and every allegation raised in the SOR. For more information, please contact The Edmunds Law Firm at (800) 481-2526 or www.nationalsecurityclearances.com

The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision and a reversal of a Decision to Revoke Eligibility for Access from the Defense Intelligence Agency. This incredible victory was dated August 19, 2009. The Edmunds Law Firm was retained to respond to a Denial of Access based on Guidelines E, G, H and J with regards to allegations concerning misuse of alcoholic beverages and alcohol related incidents. The Government felt that the abuse of alcohol adversely reflected upon Applicant's trustworthiness and reliability. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared a very powerful and compelling argument, rebutting the assertions. In a decision that will become a landmark, Applicant was granted access to compartmental information without the necessity of a Formal Hearing. If you or other individuals you know are facing Decisions to Revoke, Letters of Intent to Revoke or have been given a Statement of Reasons, please do not hesitate to contact The Edmunds Law Firm at (800) 481-2526.

On July 23, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security Clearance case. Case number 08-04241 involved an Applicant whom received a Letter of Intent to Deny Security Clearance becaused on Guideline E, Personal Conduct. Specifically, Applicant was under investigation for smoking a marijuana cigarrette while holding a Security Clearance in 2005 and had omitted the information in the e-Qip. During the hearing, Attorney Edmunds took several witness under direct examination to testify as to the Applicant's trustworthiness and character and was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons and the Administrative Law Judge granted the Applicant a clearance. For further information or assistance with a Security Clearance matter, please contact The Edmunds Law Firm at (800) 481-2526.

A favorable decision by the Administartive Law Judge was granted to The Edmunds Law Firm on July 13, 2009. Case number 08-04535 involved an applicant who received a Letter of Intent (LOI) to Deny Security Clearance based on allegations involving Foreign Influence and Foreign Preference, Guidelines B and C. Applicant was being investigated for having dual citizenship with Algeria and the United States as well as applying and being issued an Algerian Passport in 2007, despite that Applicant had become a Naturalized United States citizen in 1992. In addition, Applicant was being investigated for his/her father, brothers, sisters, father-in-law and sister-in-law being residents and/or citizens of Algeria. Attorney Edmunds was able to alleviate all of the concerns that were raised in the Statement of Reasons and Applicant was granted clearance.

 The Administrative Law Judge gave notification in writing to The Edmunds Law Firm on July 6, 2009 that a favorable decision had been made with regards to case number 08-07687. Applicant who had received a Letter of Intent (LOI) based on Guideline B, Foreign Influence, was under investigation for his/her mother, sisters and mother-in-law being citizens and residents of Iraq and brother being a citizen of Iraq and a resident of Jordan. Additionally, the Applicant had traveled to Jordan during the years of 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2008. Attorney Edmunds took several witnesses under direct examination to testify as to the Applicant's allegiance, reliability and character. Upon consideration of the evidence, witness testimonies and statements made by counsel, the Administrative Judge ruled in favor of the Applicant for all allegations raised in the Statement of Reasons.

 On May 22, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm received news of a decision in case number 07-04462 which was made in favor to an applicant with Foreign Influence allegations. The Department of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) intended to revoke the applicant's security clearance base upon Guideline B. Applicant was being investigated due to family being citizens of Portugal (Macao) and residing in Hong Kong. In addition, Applicant had traveled to China (to include Hong Kong and/or Macao) on four different occasions and to Taiwan on two different occasions. Attorney Green submitted numerous exhibits of evidence as well as interviewing several witnesses under direct and thorough examination to attest Applicant's trustworthiness, dependability and character. Upon reviewing all of the evidence submitted, the Administrative Judge concluded this matter in favor of the Applicant for the allegations risen against them in the Statement of Reasons.  

On April 14, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm was granted yet another favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number TSO-0696 involved an applicant who received a Letter of Intent to Deny Security Clearance based on Guideline E. Specifically, Applicant was being investigated for wrongfully possessing a privately owned firearm and wrongfully shipping a firearm out of a foreign country. Attorney Alan Edmunds submitted several items into evidence. Applicant and several witness testified. Upon evaluation the Judge found that is was clearly consistent with the national interest to grant the Applicant's security clearance. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at www.nationalsecurityclearances.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526.

Edmunds, Green & Robinson, LLP has received another favorable decision, this time from the Department of the Navy.  On November 15, 2007 case number ND07-00466  was upgraded from a General Discharge (Under Honorable Conditions) to an Honorable Discharge.  Attorney Alan Edmunds has shown, once again, that experience makes the difference. The Applicant was discharged from the Navy with a General (under honorable conditions) rating due to "personality disorder."  Attorney Edmunds appeared in front of the Naval Discharge Review Board to present the Applicant's case and was able to prove that there was no evidence in the Applicant's service record of misconduct, and the Applicant's evaluation ratings did reflect an acceptable level of performance and conduct.  Edmunds, Green & Robinson, LLP represents individuals throughout the world with regard to Military matters. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at www.alanedmunds.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526.

Attorney Alan V. Edmunds from Edmunds, Green & Robinson, LLP has had another victory in the Federal Court on a National Security Case.  On October 31, 2007 the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant represented by Mr. Edmunds proving that experience makes the difference.  The Department of Defense sought to deny the Applicant's Security Clearance based on Guideline F (Financial Considerations).  Although the Applicant had filed for bankruptcy twice, Attorney Edmunds was able to prove that he was not a security concern. Mr. Edmunds successfully mitigated all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons and the Administrative Law Judge granted the Applicant clearance. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at www.alanedmunds.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526. 

Another favorable decision has been granted to a National Security Clearance Applicant, represented by Attorney Alan Edmunds of Edmunds, Green & Robinson, LLP.
Once again, proving that experience makes the difference. In case number 03-25260 the Department of Defense intended to revoke the Applicant's security clearance based on Guideline B (Foreign Influence).  The Government was concerned that the Applicant "may be manipulated or induced to help a foreign person, group, organization or government in a way that is not in U.S. interests or is vulnerable to pressure or coercion by any foreign interests." Attorney Edmunds submitted numerous character references and performance evaluations to the Department of Defense on behalf of the Applicant. The Administrative Law Judge found that the information provided by Attorney Edmunds and his client "alleviated any foreign influence concerns." For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at  www.alanedmunds.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526. 

On August 23, 2007 Alan Edmunds of Edmunds, Green & Robinson, LLP, was granted yet another favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number 07-01845 involved a 30 year old applicant who received a Letter of Intent to Deny Security Clearance based on Guideline E (personal conduct), Guideline I (Emotional, Mental and Personality Disorders) and Guideline J (criminal conduct). Attorney Edmunds submitted several items into evidence. Upon evaluation the Judge found that is was clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue Applicant's security clearance.
For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at  www.alanedmunds.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526. 

Attorney Alan V. Edmunds of Edmunds, Green & Robinson, LLP has again received favorable decisions from the Administrative Law Judge in recent National Security cases proving once again that experience makes the difference. In case numbers 06-22534 and 06-17481 the applicants were denied Security Clearance under Guideline G and Guideline J (respectively). At both hearings Attorney Edmunds called numerous witnesses to testify on behalf of the applicants.  Volumes of exhibits were submitted into evidence to be considered by the Administrative Judge. Even the Applicants testified on their own behalf. Upon considering the evidence and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicants for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at  www.alanedmunds.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526.

On August 7, 2007 Attorney Alan V. Edmunds of Edmunds, Green & Robinson, LLPwon another National Security case proving that experience makes the difference.  The applicant in case number 06-24149 was a 45 year old male working for a defense contractor. The Department of Hearings and Appeals intended to revoke his security clearance based on Guideline B: Foreign Influence.  Throughout the hearing numerous witnesses were introduced and taken under direct examination by Attorney Edmunds. Mr. Edmunds was able to successfully mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons proving that the applicant's foreign relatives do not raise a security concern. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at  www.alanedmunds.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526. 

Attorney Alan V. Edmunds of Edmunds, Green & Robinson, LLP has recently received another favourable decision in a National Security case proving once again, that experience makes the difference. Case number 06-24547 involved an applicant with dual citizenship in Israel and the U.S. The Department of Defense intended to revoke the applicant's security clearance based upon Guideline B and Guideline C. During the hearing Attorney Edmunds took several witnesses under direct examination to testify as to the applicant's trustworthiness and character.  Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the evidence and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons.  For more information please contact Attorney Alan Edmunds at 800-481-2526 or www.alanedmunds.com.

Attorney Alan V. Edmunds of Edmunds, Green & Robinson, LLP has recently won another National Security case proving once again that experience makes the difference.  This particular case involved an applicant who is a 60 year old engineer that held a Security Clearance for many years.  He worked for several defense contractors and was terminated from his employment for misuse of a company credit card.  Upon considering the evidence and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons.  For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at  www.alanedmunds.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526.

Edmunds, Green & Robinson, LLP recently received another favorable decision from the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security case. This particular case involved allegations of wrongful use of a controlled substance. Allegations included the purchase and use of controlled substances and drug use covering a two year period of time.  Attorney Edmunds introduced documents, witnesses and cogently argued the facts of the case. The Administrative Law Judge felt that the case presented by Attorney Edmunds was indeed compelling and overcame the concerns of the Government. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at www.alanedmunds.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526.

Testimonials on Behalf of Our Security Clearance Representation

"I would like to thank you very much for all the help and support you have provided for me for this case. I truly appreciate all the work that has been done on my behalf for this favorable decision...If there is anything more that you may need, please let me know. Thank you again."

Regards,
-Applicant, San Diego, CA

"Hello, I wanted to let you know that the security person at ONR HQ told me that my security clearance came through. The response letter that you put together for me did the trick. After I finished the outpatient treatment I asked if they wanted me to send in a notice of completion, but by that time they had already recommended a 'favorable adjudication' and said don't bother sending it in. Not long after that I received a call from the specialist at ONR HQ telling me that my clearance was approved. (She was very nice and good about keeping me up to date with what was happening.)

I really appreciate you helping me with this matter and putting such an awesome response package together for me. I also wanted to thank you for the 'push' to go to outpatient treatment as well as attending the AA meetings. I finally 'saw the light', if you will, and am once and for all well on my road to recovery. Almost five months now clean and I've never felt better! This whole security clearance issue was probably the best thing that could have happened to me!

Thanks again for everything!!! "

Sincerely,
Applicant

"…Thank you and your associates for all your legal advice and services throughout my challenges with DOHA and my efforts to obtain a security clearance. During the hearing…I could not have asked for a better attorney to present my case to [the] Judge…Your legal approach was strong, well prepared, and most professional…Please extend my gratitude to all members of your team. Thank you for a job well done."
-J. Mayer, Santee, CA

Mr. Edmunds,

Thank you for your help last week. I was informed yesterday that I received my provisional clearance and can start work next week.
-Kathleen T. Oakland, California

Vanessa,

What a wonderful way to start the day. Thank you so very very much. You, all of you, have gone way above and beyond just meeting my needs. Thank you for your professionalism.
You are the best in the business and it shows.
-Charles C. Frankfurt, Germany

Thank you all very much. I appreciate your efforts and the positive resolution in this matter.
-E. Levine

 
Thank you very much. I am extremely happy on the decision and do not feel I could have put together an appeal letter on my own. It's been a pleasure to have worked with you and the rest of the team.
-Applicant, Eldersburg, MD